Qatar is overhauling how cross-border withholding tax relief is accessed, shifting from a refund-heavy system to a real-time, compliance-driven model.
Some GCC states, notably the UAE, maintain a 0% withholding tax policy, whereas Qatar applies a 5% withholding tax on certain cross-border payments (such as services, royalties, and interest) made to non-resident entities that do not have a permanent establishment in the state.
I spoke to Hany El-Naggar, Partner and Tax Compliance Leader for the Middle East & GCC in Acquisory Advisors, on what this means for global business.
How significant is this shift in positioning General Tax Authority’s approach to cross-border taxation?
This is a significant development as it moves Qatar from a traditional “withhold then reclaim” model toward a more practical relief-at-source mechanism for treaty benefits.
It reflects a more mature and business-friendly treaty administration framework while also placing greater responsibility on Qatari payers to assess treaty eligibility properly.
That said, the reform is not simply a relaxation. It also shifts responsibility outward from the GTA to qualifying Qatari payers. Trusted Entities are expected to assess treaty eligibility, maintain governance and controls, collect documentation, report the treaty article used, and can face withdrawal of status and financial penalties where the regime is abused or tax is underpaid. So, the significance is two-sided: it is both a facilitation measure and a compliance-governance reform
Do you see this as part of a broader trend in tax authorities globally simplifying WHT procedures?
Yes, I believe this aligns with a broader global trend toward simplifying withholding tax procedures and moving away from slow refund-based systems toward more efficient relief-at-source mechanisms, while maintaining anti-abuse safeguards. Qatar’s approach is consistent with that direction, but with a controlled local design.
Rather than allowing automatic treaty relief, it channels the process through Trusted Entities and requires approval for the foreign recipient before relief can be applied. In that sense, the regime represents simplification with safeguards — reducing administrative friction while preserving oversight over treaty entitlement, documentation, and anti-abuse considerations.
What does the application process look like to qualify for the Trusted Entity Service?
The process starts with the Qatari payer applying for Trusted Entity status through Dhareeba using the prescribed GTA forms. Eligible applicants include certain government bodies, financial institutions, and listed companies, subject to meeting specific criteria such as prior-year WHT thresholds and demonstrating adequate administrative, technical, human, and financial resources.
Importantly, the GTA expects applicants to have a robust internal compliance framework, including documented procedures, WHT controls, appropriate personnel, and systems to assess treaty eligibility properly. Once approved, Trusted Entity status is valid for 3 years and renewable (application at least 60 days before expiry). The GTA may withdraw the status in cases of non-compliance or misuse.
Operationally, foreign recipients must then submit their treaty-relief application and supporting documents to the Trusted Entity. Upon approval, the Trusted Entity may apply treaty benefits at source and remains responsible for ongoing monthly WHT reporting through Dhareeba, including payment details and treaty article references.
How will foreign recipients need to adapt; do they still need to provide residency certificates or additional documentation?
Yes — foreign recipients will still need to provide substantive documentation. While the reform simplifies the timing of treaty relief, it does not remove the requirement to evidence treaty entitlement. Typically, this will include a Tax Residency Certificate, along with supporting documentation relating to beneficial ownership, substance, PE status in Qatar, and confirmation that the arrangement is not primarily aimed at obtaining treaty benefits.
In practice, foreign recipients should expect a robust review process rather than a light-touch approach, with Trusted Entities likely requesting treaty analysis, entity details, and contract-level support before approving relief. Importantly, the approval is not indefinite — it generally remains valid until the earlier of the Trusted Entity’s expiry or 12 months from the issuance of the Tax Residency Certificate, subject to renewal/update requirements in certain cases.
Overall, foreign recipients move from a refund-based process to a more front-loaded documentation process — improving cash flow but increasing the importance of document readiness.
Are there other industries, such as LNG, that will benefit disproportionately?
The primary beneficiaries are likely to be businesses with high volumes of recurring cross-border payments subject to Qatar WHT, particularly where treaty relief is commonly relevant.
This includes sectors such as financial services, listed groups, infrastructure-heavy businesses, and companies with significant payments for foreign services, technology, financing, licensing, or IP. Oil & gas may also benefit, given the scale of cross-border technical and financing arrangements in the sector.
However, the impact there is more nuanced due to Qatar’s specific fiscal and contractual frameworks applicable to certain oil & gas arrangements. More broadly, the regime will be most valuable for businesses where the previous refund model created cash flow constraints or commercial friction, particularly in contracts involving gross-up clauses or net-of-tax pricing discussions.
What should companies start doing now to be ready for this shift?
Companies should start by assessing whether they are realistic candidates for Trusted Entity status, including eligibility, WHT transaction thresholds, and whether they have sufficient internal tax/finance infrastructure to operate the regime properly.
They should then establish a robust internal governance framework, including documented WHT procedures, treaty review workflows, clear responsibilities across teams, and controls over documentation and treaty eligibility assessments.
A review of vendor and payment profiles is also essential to identify relevant non-resident payments, applicable treaties, and higher-risk arrangements requiring closer scrutiny. Finally, companies should engage with foreign recipients early to communicate documentation requirements and ensure readiness before payments are made.
Overall, businesses that approach this as a governance and process enhancement exercise, rather than simply a tax-saving opportunity, will be best positioned to benefit.
Stay Up to Date with the Latest Updates at Finance ME
Jebel Ali SME on “Made in the UAE”
DIFC Introduces Temporary Relief Measures
EDGE’s Rodrigo Torres on Risk, Sovereignty and Defence Finance in a Multipolar World
