Posted inAnalysis

The De-Americanisation of Global Portfolios: Managing Non-Dollar Alpha 

Global capital is diversifying, not abandoning the US, as GCC investors tap IMEC and emerging markets for long-term growth.

Roberto d'Ambrosio, CEO at Axiory
Roberto d'Ambrosio, CEO at Axiory

As 2026 unfolds, the question of whether global capital is moving away from the United States has shifted from theoretical debate to portfolio reality.

The dollar’s share of central bank reserves has drifted to its lowest level in three decades, new trade architectures are taking physical shape, and investors from Mumbai to Riyadh are asking where the next decade of returns will come from. The question is legitimate. The way many are answering it is not. 

Exit Trade

The conventional framing treats de-Americanisation as an exit trade: reduce dollar exposure, rotate into the emerging multipolar landscape, and do it before everyone else does. 

In my opinion, this is precisely the wrong way to think about it. The United States still represents a dominant share of global market capitalisation, the deepest pools of liquidity in the world, and a currency that remains on one side of the vast majority of foreign exchange transactions.

Reserve Share

A reserve share declining from roughly 71% at the turn of the century to around 57% today is a meaningful structural signal; it is not a collapse and it does not justify treating dollar assets as a position to be unwound.

Investors who aggressively liquidate U.S. exposure are not reducing risk. They are exchanging a concentration risk they understand for execution, liquidity, and correlation risks they do not. 

What is genuinely changing is where new opportunity is being created, and the Middle East sits at the centre of it. The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, signed by India, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and European partners, has moved from memorandum to construction, with infrastructure work underway and renewed political momentum behind it this year.

IMEC Corridor

A corridor capable of cutting transit times between India and Europe by an estimated 40% is not merely a logistics project. It is a generator of new asset classes: ports, rail, energy infrastructure, digital connectivity, and the financing, insurance, and trade-settlement flows that follow them, increasingly denominated in a wider basket of currencies. 

This is where the consequence chain matters for portfolio construction. New corridors re-route trade; re-routed trade creates new revenue streams and investable assets; those assets offer returns less correlated with US cycles, which is the genuine prize of non-dollar alpha. The final link of the chain deserves equal attention. These markets are younger and their liquidity is still deepening, but the trajectory is unmistakable: governments across the corridor are modernising regulation, strengthening legal and settlement frameworks, and building market infrastructure with the deliberateness of national strategy rather than the slow drift of organic development.

That leadership-driven maturation is precisely what makes the opportunity credible. It does not, however, suspend the laws of risk. Frameworks that are improving rapidly have not yet been tested by a full cycle of stress, and position sizing, liquidity buffers, and scenario discipline remain the difference between diversification that strengthens a portfolio and diversification that quietly concentrates new fragilities inside it. 

DP World in India

For investors in the GCC, the opportunity is distinctive, because the region is not observing this transition; it is financing it. DP World has committed a further five billion dollars to India’s maritime and logistics infrastructure, on top of three billion invested over the past three decades, while UAE sovereign capital is anchoring India’s national infrastructure investment platforms and Gulf financial institutions are establishing themselves in India’s emerging financial hubs. Regional investors are positioned at both ends of the corridor. The discipline lies in participating in that growth without abandoning the ballast that dollar assets still provide. 

None of this can be executed by models alone. Frameworks calibrated on a dollar-centric world will misread a transition that is rewriting correlations in real time. Navigating it requires professionals who understand both the legacy system and the emerging one, who can size positions in fast-maturing markets, and who are empowered to challenge the assumption that what is new is automatically diversifying. 

The de-Americanisation of global portfolios is real, and it will reward those who approach it with structure rather than conviction alone. Diversification, done properly, is an act of addition, not subtraction. The portfolios that benefit most from a multipolar world will be those that built their way into it, not those that fled into it. 


Stay Up to Date with the Latest Updates at Finance ME

Sarah Al-Shawwaf: Vision 2030 Has Unlocked the Potential of Saudi Women

Mohamed Alabbar: Damascus City to Watch in Next Decade

EDGE’s Rodrigo Torres on Risk, Sovereignty and Defence Finance in a Multipolar World